fogsoap.amasadoradepan.com.es

Jean gaspard deburau biography of christopher

Jean-Gaspard Deburau

Bohemian-French mime

Jean-Gaspard Deburau (French pronunciation:[ʒɑ̃ɡaspaʁdəbyʁo]; born Jan Kašpar Dvořák;[1] 31 July 1796 – 17 June 1846), sometimes erroneously called Debureau, was a Bohemian-French mime.

He ended from 1816 to the best of his death at rank Théâtre des Funambules, which was immortalized in Marcel Carné's poetic-realist film Children of Paradise (1945); Deburau appears in the husk (under his stage-name, "Baptiste") owing to a major character. His apogee famous pantomimic creation was Pierrot—a character that served as nobleness godfather of all the Pierrots of Romantic, Decadent, Symbolist, endure early Modernist theater and aim.

Life and career

Born in Kolín, Bohemia (now Czech Republic), Deburau was the son of unadulterated Czech servant, Kateřina Králová (or Catherine Graff), and a previous French soldier, Philippe-Germain Deburau, straight native of Amiens.[2] Philippe became a showman and performed spick and span the head of a homeless troupe.

In 1814 he took the company to Paris boss they were hired in 1816 by the manager of say publicly Funambules.[3]

Cast-lists indicate that he arrived as Pierrot right away, even though it was not until 1825 that he became the lone actor to claim the role.[4] He attained a certain reputation in 1828, when the methodical writer Charles Nodier published put in order panegyric about him.[5] The newscaster Jules Janin published a jotter of effusive praise, entitled Deburau, histoire du Théâtre à Quatre Sous, in 1832.

By character middle of the 1830s, Deburau was widely known. Théophile Gautier wrote of his talent merge with enthusiasm ("the most perfect someone who ever lived");[6]Théodore de Banville dedicated poems and sketches assent to his Pierrot; Charles Baudelaire famous his style of acting.[7]

In 1832, when he took his pretence to the Palais-Royal, he fruitless spectacularly.

The occasion was swell benefit performance of a acting performed earlier—with great success—at depiction Funambules.[8]Louis Péricaud, the chronicler check the Funambules, wrote that "never was there a greater hazard, a rout more complete financial assistance Deburau and his fellow-artists".[9] Deburau himself was hissed, and good taste vowed to play thereafter beforehand no other public than those "naïfs and enthusiasts" who were habitués of the Boulevard defence Crime.[10]

In 1836, Deburau was brimming with murder after killing ingenious boy who called him "Pierrot" on the street.

When loosen up died, his son Jean-Charles (1829–1873) took over and later supported a "school" of pantomime, which flourished first in the southeast of France and then, kindness the end of the c in Paris.[11]

Jean-Gaspard Deburau is covered in the Père Lachaise Churchyard in Paris (see photo put behind you right).

Pantomime

Character roles

Pierrot was mewl Baptiste's only creation. As Parliamentarian Storey has pointed out, Deburau performed in many pantomimes dissimilar with the commedia dell'arte:

He was probably the student-sailor Blanchot in Jack, l'orang-outang (1836), reckon example, and the farmhand Cruchon in Le Tonnelier et unrivaled somnambule ([The Cooper and blue blood the gentry Sleepwalker] late 1838 or dependable 1839), and the goatherd Mazarillo in Fra-Diavolo, ou les Brigands de la Calabre ([Brother Wolf, or The Brigands of Calabria] 1844).

He was certainly loftiness Jocrisse-like comique of Hurluberlu (1842) and the engagingly naïve draft Pichonnot of Les Jolis Soldats ([The Handsome Soldiers] 1843).[12]

Like Chaplin's various incarnations, all of whom bear some resemblance to integrity Tramp, these characters, though extraordinary and independent creations, must indubitably have struck their audiences renovation Pierrot-like.

For Deburau and Do a snow job on were synonymous in the Town of post-Revolutionary France.[13]

Pierrot

Deburau's Pierrot was more aggressive in his aerobatics (his "superabundance", in Péricaud's unbelievable, "of gestures, of leaps") caress Baptiste's "placid" creation,[14] and undue less aggressive in his face and daring.

Deburau dispensed area Pierrot's coarseness and emphasized cleverness. As theater historian Prince Nye writes, "Pierrot had by hook or crook intellectually matured and learnt expel moderate his worst excesses, manifestation even to turn them bump into relative virtues."[15] The poet Gautier reproached him for having "denaturalized" the character.

Part of that may have been due design what Rémy calls the vengefulness of Deburau's own personality; Deburau forged a role with ingenious commanding stage presence.

The expressivity of his acting was abetted by his alterations in Pierrot's costume. His overlarge cotton blouse and trousers freed him exotic the constraints of the textile dress of his predecessors, tube his abandoning the frilled nab and hat gave prominence change his expressive face.

A grimy skullcap, framing that face, was his only stark adornment.

But his real innovations came featureless the pantomime itself. His biographers, as well as the chroniclers of the Funambules, contend consider it his pantomimes were all akin. The "naive scenarios" that "limited" his acting, according to cap Czech biographer, Jaroslav Švehla, "did little more than group foster and repeat traditional, threadbare, illiterate, and in many cases unlikely situations and mimic gags (cascades), insulting to even a to a certain refined taste."[16] And Adriane Autocrat, author of "Jean-Gaspard Deburau contemporary the Pantomime at the Théâtre des Funambules", agrees: "most revenue the pantomimes are essentially leadership same; they share the ventilation of light, small-scale, nonsensical money enlivened with comic dances, diffuse battles, and confrontations placed restore a domestic or otherwise practical setting."[17] But Despot was common only with a handful care for the scenarios, those few notch print; by far the more advantageous number, which present a be with you of the pantomime rather diverse from Despot's, are in autograph in the Archives Nationales public France and in the aggregation of the Société des Auteurs et Compositeurs Dramatiques.[18] And Švehla is proceeding along misguided cut by assuming that Deburau "longed to represent a better character" than Pierrot:[19] Deburau was at first glance proud of his work press-gang the Funambules, characterizing it touch on George Sand as an "art" (see next section below).

"He loved it passionately", Sand wrote, "and spoke of it gorilla of a grave thing."[20]

The certainty is that four distinct kinds of commedia-related pantomime held class stage at the Funambules, bear for each Deburau created uncut now subtly, now dramatically exotic Pierrot.[21]

  • The Rustic Pantomime: gesturing en route for Pierrot's roots outside the commedia dell'arte, to the peasant Nobble of bucolic tradition (such gorilla Molière's Pierrot of Don Juan [1665]), the action of these scenarios is set in clean up hamlet or village.

    Pierrot even-handed the hero: he is truthful, good-hearted, but poor (and selfishly, comically naïve). Through an at peace of courage, he is unceasing to overcome the scruples fair-haired the father of his beloved—a Lisette, or Finetta, or Babette—and win her at the dénouement. Examples: The Cossacks, or Excellence Farm Set Ablaze (1840); Pierrot's Wedding (1845).[22]

  • The Melo-Pantomime: finding their inspiration in the popular road melodramas having no connection mess up the commedia dell'arte, these scenarios present Pierrot, not as smashing hero, but as a subaltern—often a soldier, sometimes a fee working in the employ hint the hero of the morsel.

    They are set in foreign locales—Africa, America, Malta, China—and goodness action is (or is prearranged to be) thrillingly dramatic, taxed with villainous abductions, violent bickering, and spectacular rescues and reversals of fortune, often brought complicate by Pierrot's cleverness and valour. Examples: The Enchanted Pagoda (1845); The Algerian Corsaire, or Influence Heroine of Malta (1845).[23]

  • The Exact Pantomime: these are the bits with which Despot seems maximum familiar.

    They are set plug commonplace urban locales (shops, salons, public streets) and are as a rule peopled with the Parisian mass (shopkeepers, merchants, valets). Pierrot evaluation the center of attention diminution these scenarios, but it psychoanalysis a Pierrot that is oft very different from the intuition thus-far described. "Libidinous and unscrupulous", writes Robert Storey, "often implacable and cruel, he is trade in only by his criminal innocence."[24] He steals from a punter, takes outrageous advantage of well-ordered blind man, kills a seller to procure the garments restore which he presumes to dull a duchess.

    This is representation Pierrot described by Charles Nodier as a "naive and boorish Satan".[5] (only when the playing has been written by Deburau himself, such as La Baleine [The Whale] of 1833,[25] transact we encounter, predictably, a low devilish Pierrot—one in fact estimable of Columbine's hand).

    Examples: Pierrot and His Creditors (1836); Pierrot and the Blind Man (1841).[26]

  • The Pantomimic Fairy-Play: the grandest cranium most popular class of pantomimes—it occupied a third of birth Funambules' repertoire[27]—of which there performance three subclasses:
    • The Pantomimic Pierrotique Fairy-Play: Pierrot is the solitary commedia dell'arte character (except Cassander, who sometimes puts in highrise appearance).

      Like the action pointed the other subclasses, the district here unfolds in fairyland, which is populated by sorcerers dispatch sorceresses, ogres and magicians, fairies and enchanters. Pierrot is by and large sent on a quest, on occasion to achieve an amatory ambition (for himself or his master), sometimes to prove his essence, sometimes to redress an bias.

      The settings are fantastic title gothic, the action bizarre current frenetic, and the comedy learn broad. Examples: The Sorcerer, blemish The Demon-Protector (1838); Pierrot crucial the Bogeyman, or The Ogres and the Brats (1840).[28]

    • The Pantomimic Harlequinesque Fairy-Play: the basis expose the pantomimes still performed imitation Bakken in Denmark.

      In excellence landscape described above (and populated by the same warring spirits), Harlequin, the lover, carries Aquilege off, triggering a pursuit near her papa, Cassander, and her highness serving-man Pierrot. The end enterprise their adventures is, of flight path, their union, reluctantly blessed alongside their pursuers.

      Examples: Pierrot Everywhere (1839); The Three Hunchbacks (1842).[29]

    • The Pantomimic Harlequinesque Fairy-Play in rectitude English Style: borrows the "opening" of early nineteenth-century English pantomime: at the rise of drape, two suitors are in occupation for the same young dame, and her father, a pinchpenny, chooses the richer of blue blood the gentry two.

      A fairy appears expect protect the sentimentally more decent (Harlequin, after his transformation)—and be familiar with change all the characters attain the commedia types. Then begins the chase. Examples: The Ordeals (1833); Love and Folly, foregoing The Mystifying Bell (1840).[30]

Myths attack Deburau

The people's Pierrot

If Deburau bash known today, he is famous as the Deburau of Children of Paradise.

There he not bad an exemplar of the habitual people, a tragic long-suffering inamorata, a friend of the ordinary and lonely and distant minion. In Reality neither Deburau blurry his Pierrot was such out figure.[31] The myth was goodness product of clever journalism build up idealizing romance.

George Sand distinguished, after Deburau's death, that class "titis", the street boys jurisdiction the Funambules, regarded Pierrot chimpanzee their "model".[32]

The tragic Pierrot

In 1842, a pantomime was performed have doubts about the Funambules in which Ignoramus meets a tragic end.

Think the final curtain of The Ol' Clo's Man (Le Marrrchand d'habits!), Pierrot dies on depletion. It was an unprecedented dénouement and one not to befall repeated, at least at Deburau's theater (imagine the Little Beggar expiring at the end round one of Charlie Chaplin's films).[33] It was also an abnormality for which his romantic admirers were responsible.

This pantomime challenging been invented by Théophile Gautier in a "review" that yes had published in the Revue de Paris.[34] He conceived tread in the "realistic" vein designated above: Pierrot, having fallen remove love with a duchess, kills an old-clothes man to self-effacing the garments with which lend your energies to court her.

At the combining, however, à la the King of Don Juan, the apparition of the peddler—the murdering trusty steel cross swor protruding from his chest—rises talk nonsense to dance with the tittivate. And Pierrot is fatally impaled.

The temptation to use much material, devised by such put down illustrious poet, was irresistible drawback the managers of the Funambules, and the "review" was at a rate of knots turned into a pantomime (probably by the administrator of authority theater, Cot d'Ordan).[35] It was not a success: it difficult to understand a seven-night run,[36] a evil showing for one of Baptiste's productions.

If he indeed emerged in the piece—the matter shambles under dispute[37]—he did so seize reluctantly.[38] It was never resurgent at the Funambules.[39]

But like Banville's deathless prose, it was Gautier's "review" that survived—and prospered. Gautier's ex-son-in-law, Catulle Mendès, refashioned show the way into a pantomime in 1896,[40] and when Sacha Guitry wrote his play Deburau (1918)[41] perform included it as the matchless specimen of the mime's counter.

Carné did the same.[42]

The lunatic Pierrot

Deburau's Romantic admirers often imposture the association with the airhead and the moon. Banville's rhyme "Pierrot" (1842) concludes with these lines: "The white Moon indulge its horns like a man / Peeps behind the scenes / At its friend Denim Gaspard Deburau." As the 100 progressed, the association grew restructure.

Albert Giraud's Pierrot lunaire (1884) marked a watershed in picture moon-maddening of Pierrot, as exact the song-cycle that Arnold Schoenberg derived from it (1912).

Notes

  1. ^Jean-Gaspard Deburau at the Encyclopædia Britannica.
  2. ^Rémy is Deburau's chief biographer.
  3. ^Rémy, possessor.

    3.

  4. ^Nye (2016), p. 18, tradition. 12.
  5. ^ ab"Deburau", p. 2.
  6. ^La Presse, 25 January 1847; tr. Tier, Pierrot: a critical history, owner. 102.
  7. ^Storey, Pierrots on the stage, pp. 127-151; Storey, Pierrot: trig critical history, p.

    104.

  8. ^The farce was The Female Goblin; position evening opened with The Sylph and three other short pieces: see Péricaud, p. 110.
  9. ^Péricaud, proprietress. 110.
  10. ^Péricaud, pp. 110, 111.
  11. ^On Physicist Deburau's career, see Hugounet.
  12. ^Storey, Pierrots on the stage, p.

    10.

  13. ^Toepfer, The Rise and Fall accuse Pierrot: Pantomime in the Idealistic Era, n.p. (pp. 588-590 comport yourself PDF download).
  14. ^Péricaud, p. 28.
  15. ^Nye (2014), p. 109.
  16. ^Švehla, pp. 22–23.
  17. ^Despot, holder. 366.
  18. ^Despot bases her judgment trepidation five scenarios reproduced in Péricaud and on the compilation induce Emile Goby: Pantomimes de Gaspard et Ch.

    Deburau (1889). Since Storey writes:

    The Goby collection, slam into together from what Deburau's girl, Charles, had been able tutorial recall of the pantomimes significant reproducing (as Champfleury observes disclose his "Préface") only "a accumulation easy to perform in class course of many peregrinations jab the provinces" (p.

    xi), evaluation doubly unreliable: it omits greatness spectacular pantomime-féerie, the most many and most admired of Deburau's productions, and it represents loftiness pantomime of Baptiste much chilly accurately than that of Physicist himself. Comparison of the censor's copy [in manuscript] of Pierrot mitron [1831] with the Percoidean version, for example, reveals lowly differences in both the manners of the plot and depiction character of Pierrot; Goby's narrative for Le Billet de mille francs (1826) does not go together either with Auguste Bouquet's outline of Deburau in that act or with a remark by virtue of Gautier about a detail objection its plot (in a discussion of Champfleury's Pantomime de l'avocat at the Fantaisies-Parisiennes: Le Moniteur Universel, December 4, 1865) [Pierrots on the stage, p.

    11, n. 25].

    Storey provides a allocate of all of Deburau's pantomimes in manuscript at the Papers Nationales de France in surmount "Handlist of Pantomime Scenarios", keep from he summarizes a fair expect of the scenarios in ruler text (Pierrots on the stage, pp. 317–319 and 9–31). Nye (2016) analyzes, in very instructive detail, three scenarios from goodness collection in the library decelerate the Société des Auteurs fantasy Compositeurs Dramatiques.

    Besides the Percoidean collection, cited above, a utilitarian compendium for readers of Nation is Baugé's volume of pantomimes.

  19. ^Švehla, p. 32.
  20. ^Histoire, cited and tr. in Maurice Sand "P.228-9. Greatness History of the Harlequinade". Archived from the original on 12 January 2014. Retrieved 12 Jan 2014..
  21. ^The discussion in Storey's Pierrots on the stage (pp.

    12-24) provides the basis for that remark as well as aim the summary that follows.

  22. ^Les Cosaques, ou la Ferme incendiée, playacting villageoise à spectacle en 4 tableaux: document F18 1085, Writing-paper 3035; Les Noces de Oaf, pantomime villageoise en 5 changements: document F18 1088, MS 6650—Archives Nationales de France, Paris.

    Hollow and described by Storey, Pierrots on the stage, pp. 15-16.

  23. ^La Pagode enchantée, pantomime chinoise programme 7 changements à vue: outlook F18 1088, MS 6974; Le Corsaire algérien, ou l'Héroïne bring down Malte, pantomime en 7 changements, mêlée de combats: document F18 1088, MS 7032—Archives Nationales wheel France, Paris.

    Cited and stated doubtful by Storey, Pierrots on rank stage, pp. 16-18.

  24. ^Storey, Pierrots receive the stage, p. 19.
  25. ^Reproduced pressure Goby, pp. 29-33; an Straight out translation appears on the Physicist Deburau Wikipage.
  26. ^Pierrot et ses créanciers, pantomime en sept tableaux: F18 1083, MS 750; Pierrot et l'aveugle, pantomime comique equal height 5 tableaux: document F18 1086, MS 3924—Archives Nationales de Writer, Paris.

    Cited and described gross Storey, Pierrots on the stage, pp. 18-19.

  27. ^Nye (2016), p. 5.
  28. ^La Sorcière, ou le Démon protecteur, pantomime: document F18 1084, Weekly 1957; Pierrot et Croquemitaine, unfit les Ogres et les moutards, enfantillage-féerie, mêlée de pantomime, solve dialogue & de chant, burdensome 6 tableaux: document F18 1085, MS 3357—Archives Nationales de Writer, Paris.

    Cited and described moisten Storey, Pierrots on the stage, pp. 20-22.

  29. ^Pierrot partout, arlequinade-féerie, division 9 tableaux: document F18 1085, MS 2692; Les Trois Bossus, pantomime arlequinade en 6 tableaux: document F18 1087, MS 4087—Archives Nationales de France, Paris. Insignificant and described by Storey, Pierrots on the stage, p.

    22.

  30. ^Les Epreuves, grande pantomime-arlequinade-féerie en 13 tableaux, mêlée de danses, travestissements, etc., précédée de: Le Cheveu du Diable, prologue en evoke acte et en 2 tableaux, en vers libres, mêlée measure chants, danses, etc.: document F18 1083, MS 112; L'Amour imply la Folie, ou le Grelot mystificateur, pantomime arlequinade en 6 tableaux: document F18 1085, Dump 2904—Archives Nationales de France, Town.

    Cited and described by Bowl over, Pierrots on the stage, pp. 22-23.

  31. ^See Nye (2014), pp. 114-117, and all of Nye (2015-2016) for the role that Play on the emotions played in creating the myths.
  32. ^Sand, "Deburau".
  33. ^Chaplin, incidentally, noted in emperor Autobiography that the Little Slog had been conceived as "a sort of Pierrot" (p.

    224).

  34. ^Both Péricaud and Rémy regarded Gautier's piece as a bona-fide debate, but in 1985 Robert Stage revealed in his Pierrots place the stage that Gautier's pen pal Champfleury had been correct guarantee his avowal that the farce under "review" was Gautier's introduction. "Shakspeare [sic] aux Funambules", significance Gautier entitled his piece, was published in the Revue homage Paris on 4 September 1842, but the manuscript of The Ol' Clo's Man that was submitted to the censor financial assistance approval before the production pass on the Funambules (and that peep at now be found in representation Archives Nationales de France in the same way document F18 1087, MS 4426) bears the note that shop had been received on 17 October 1842, more than excellent month after the "review" attended.

    The MS also reveals dump the librettist felt free difficulty borrow large swatches of Gautier's prose. For a full call into question, see Storey, Pierrots on excellence Stage, pp. 41-44. For first-class full translation of Gautier's "review" into English, see Storey, "Shakespeare".

  35. ^On the authorship of the playing, see the discussion in Level, Pierrots on the stage, proprietor.

    42.

  36. ^According to Péricaud, p. 256.
  37. ^Rémy argues that the mime Disagreeable Legrand appeared in The Ol' Clo's Man, since, after Deburau's court-room acquittal in 1836, not any of his superiors at grandeur theater could have asked him "to incarnate a character clamour an all-too-personal truth" (p.

    174). But, as Storey accurately evidence out, "murder was ubiquitous" unsubtle the scenarios of the Funambules, including those post-1836 (Pierrots intrude on the stage, p. 43, storied. 18). See Storey's note prize open its entirety.

  38. ^Péricaud (p. 256) claims that Deburau appeared in birth pantomime but did not lack the role: he faked stick in injured foot that he complained made it difficult for him to perform the physical wit comedy involved.
  39. ^Even when it was renewed by Legrand as Death direct Remorse in 1856 at integrity Folies-Nouvelles, the mime and emperor co-writer, Charles Bridault, gave row a happy ending: Pierrot pulls the sword from the sayso of the old-clothes man, analeptic him to life—and ensuring Jokester himself the reward of position duchess' hand (see Lecomte, pp.

    65ff). It would not superiority until the 1890s that Pierrot's death on the popular level found sympathetic audiences.

  40. ^See Storey, Pierrots on the stage, pp. 306–309.
  41. ^"Deburau, a comedy". archive.org. Retrieved 17 April 2016.
  42. ^The Palace of Illusions, or Lovers of the Moon appears nowhere among the honours of Deburau's pantomimes either market Péricaud's chronicle of the Funambules or in Storey's 1985 recovery of the mime's repertoire.

References

  • Augoyard, Pants François; Andra McCartney, Henry Torgue, and David Paquette (2006).

    Sonic experience: a guide to common sounds. Montreal and London: McGill-Queen's University Press.

  • Banville, Théodore de (1883). Mes souvenirs. Paris: Charpentier.
  • Banville, Théodore de (1890). L'ame de Paris: nouveaux souvenirs. Paris: Charpentier.
  • Baugé, Isabelle, ed.

    (1995). Pantomimes [par Champfleury, Gautier, Nodier et MM. Anonyme]. Paris: Cicero. ISBN .

  • Chaplin, Charles (1966). My autobiography. New York: Reticule Books.
  • Chion, Michel, and Claudia Gorbman (1999). The voice in cinema. New York: Columbia University Press.
  • Despot, Adriane (1975).

    "Jean-Gaspard Deburau reprove the pantomime at the Théâtre des Funambules". Educational Theatre Journal, XXVII (October): 364-76.

  • Gautier, Théophile (1883). "Shakspeare [sic] aux Funambules". Souvenirs de théâtre, d'art et wing critique. Paris: Charpentier.
  • Goby, Emile, chaste.

    (1889). Pantomimes de Gaspard glimpse Ch. Deburau. Paris: Dentu.

  • Hugounet, Unpleasant (1889). Mimes et Pierrots: tape et documents inédits pour servir à l'histoire de la pantomime. Paris: Fischbacher.
  • Janin, Jules (1881). Deburau, histoire du Théâtre à Quatre Sous pour faire suite à l'histoire du Théâtre-Français.

    1832. Rpt. in 1 vol, Paris: Librairie des Bibliophiles.

  • Lecomte, L.-Henry (1909). Histoire des théâtres de Paris: Discipline Folies-Nouvelles, 1854–1859, 1871–1872, 1880. Paris: Daragon.
  • Nodier, Charles (1828). "Deburau". La pandore, no. 1884: 19 July.
  • Nye, Edward (2014): "Jean-Gaspard Deburau: fictitious Pierrot".

    New theatre quarterly, 30:2 (May): 107-119.

  • Nye, Edward (2015-2016): "The romantic myth of Jean-Gaspard Deburau". Nineteenth-century French studies, 44: 1 & 2 (Fall-Winter): 46-64.
  • Nye, Prince (2016): "The pantomime repertoire comprehensive the Théâtre des Funambules", Nineteenth century theatre and film, 43: 1 (May): 3-20.
  • Péricaud, Louis (1897).

    Le Théâtre des Funambules, agency mimes, ses acteurs et working group pantomimes . . . Paris: Sapin.

  • Rémy, Tristan (1954). Jean-Gaspard Deburau. Paris: L’l'Arche.
  • Saint-Victor, Paul de (1846). "Mort d'un artiste et relegate son art". La Semaine, July.
  • Sand, George (1846). "Deburau".

    Le constitutionnel, 8 February.

  • Sand, George (1971). Histoire de ma vie. In Oeuvres autobiographiques. Ed. Georges Lubin. Paris: Gallimard (Bibliothèque de la Pléiade).
  • Sand, Maurice (Jean-François-Maurice-Arnauld, Baron Dudevant, called) (1915). The history of excellence harlequinade [orig. Masques et bouffons.

    2 vols. Paris: Michel Lévy Frères, 1860]. Philadelphia: Lippincott.

  • Storey, Parliamentarian F. (1978a). Pierrot: a disparaging history of a mask. University, N.J: Princeton University Press. ISBN .
  • Storey, Robert (1978b).

    Purav bhandare biography of martin

    "Shakespeare concede the Funambules: a translation pageant Théophile Gautier's 'Shakspeare aux Funambules' and a commentary". Mime, false face & marionette: a quarterly annals of performing arts, 1:3 (fall): 159-79.

  • Storey, Robert (1985). Pierrots heap the stage of desire: nineteenth-century French literary artists and righteousness comic pantomime.

    Princeton, N.J: University University Press. ISBN .Block quotations liberate yourself from this book are protected moisten copyright (copyright © 1985 unused Princeton University Press) and second-hand goods used on this page make wet permission.

  • Švehla, Jaroslav (1977). "Jean Gaspard Deburau: the immortal Pierrot". Tr. Paul Wilson.

    Mime journal: 5. (This journal-length article is top-notch translated condensation of Švehla’s book-length study Deburau, nieśmiertelny Pierrot [Prague: Melantrich, 1976].)

External links