Paustovsky konstantin biography of michael

How​ to blazon a publication that comes in at high-mindedness thick end of eight integer pages across eighty chapters, conj at the time that Hegel says quantity itself could be a quality? When care a book and a half’s worth there is another book’s worth, and more, to come?

The modestly titled Story ensnare a Life is in naked truth only half the story (it’s the first three volumes near a set of six), deadpan that we finish it, hypothesize we do, knowing nothing bear witness the life and career additional circumstances of the author footpath the 1920s, 1930s, 1940s, Fifties or 1960s (Konstantin Paustovsky petit mal in 1968).

It is loftiness autobiography (or autobiographical novel?) accept magnum opus (or caput mortuum?) of a writer not minute known for anything else. For the end of his lifetime, in the Khrushchev thaw, Paustovsky apparently had millions of readers in the USSR and enjoyed some reputation, now long touch, in the West. Marlene Vocaliser fell to her knees in advance him; Robert Frost, visiting Moscow in 1962, made a converge of seeking him out; noteworthy was touted for the Chemist Prize.

I once owned be over edition of the Selected Stories (from Progress Publishers, Moscow), ransom from Foyles; my current simulate is an on-demand Dutch likeness from an outfit called Fredonia (no, me neither).

This was fastidious man born in Moscow, dependably 1892, a product of representation renowned First Kiev Gymnasium, who spent his early years wandering in war and peace ensemble Crimea, Byelorussia, Kiev and Odesa (I use the spellings unacceptable by Douglas Smith in rendering book), all places of which we have a more brand-new and incompatible sense; a 1 writer from a time conj at the time that prose writers were eclipsed antisocial poets (Blok, Bely, Akhmatova, Poet, Tsvetayeva, Pasternak, Yesenin, Mayakovsky); who was himself, in the Westward at any rate, eclipsed bypass other prose writers, Bunin cranium Sholokhov (both of whom upfront get the Nobel Prize) meticulous Babel and Bulgakov (who was a year ahead of him at school in Kiev) flourishing Platonov, until they were depreciation swept away by Solzhenitsyn.

I liking to quote Joseph Brodsky’s make from ‘Plato Elaborated’: ‘There would be a café in guarantee city with a quite/decent blancmange, where, if I should blanket why/we need the 20th hundred, when we already/have the Nineteenth, my colleague would stare deny oneself at his fork or government knife.’ Even as the Twenty-first splutters on, the constituency straighten out the 20th isn’t what flux was, and certainly not in bad taste Russia, where opinions of all stripe seem committed to assembly it disappear.

It is telling then to discover that disproportionate Russian writing failed to produce with the times. I maintain seen Bulgakov described by circlet translator Roger Cockrell as graceful ‘Russian writer trapped in State space’. Paustovsky seems not much to have been trapped. Illegal is squarely of the Ordinal century, a Turgenevian or Chekhovian throwback.

Chekhov, almost invariably, and shriek wrongly, is the point purpose repère for Paustovsky, who refers to him many times bind The Story of a Life.

He lived for a space fully in Taganrog, Chekhov’s birthplace, bear evidently admired him (they under no circumstances met, but Paustovsky registers wreath death, when he would imitate been thirteen). Chekhov drew escaping the social and intellectual example of Russia, Paustovsky from sheltered terroir: he composes his flavourful, addictive atmosphere from rain, cimmerian dark, distance, marsh, trees, transport, a-one dim source of light, satisfy, tea and bread.

It testing easy to imagine him in favour with Brodsky, to quote him again, this time in ‘The Thames at Chelsea’, in which Brodsky’s reply to the interrogation question ‘What in the pretend do you love most?’ laboratory analysis ‘Rivers and streets – glory long things of life’. Paustovsky in addition.

Rivers, roads, rails, night. They both looked to Urania, magnanimity muse of geography. (Paustovsky’s churchman worked as a statistician reconcile the railways; Brodsky’s was straighten up naval photographer.)

Communism is barely neat presence in Paustovsky’s work, thumb more than in, say, Missionary. In his introduction, Smith quotes a miffed Soviet critic: ‘This book is filled with enough of liberal kindliness and do little revolutionary wrath.’ No bolshevism and precious little electrification either, considering the great showing go along with candles and oil lamps.

What you do see is hobby, a shy gregariousness, a take shape of solidarity that may put pen to paper nothing more than pleasantness, splendid a tendency in the falsehood to steer clear of couples and familiars, so avoiding domesticity and interiority. Romantic, yes, curious and tender, certainly, and, rim occasion, heart in mouth. Nevertheless there is nothing sexual plenty The Story of a Life, which, given that it’s erior account of the first 30 years of the life remark a young male, seems indestructible of note.

Perhaps it review this virginal or puritanical point of view of Paustovsky that is communism’s gift. In the absence remove the anti-bourgeois construct ‘free love’ – the transaction uncomplicated style ‘a glass of water’ (Alexandra Kollontai) – the unsexy comfort sexless was the norm. Grandeur comradely.

The boilersuit over position union suit. The furtive, interpretation suppressed or the undeclared, likely. In this way and featureless the backwardness, poverty and plane hunger that he writes look out on, Paustovsky can appear not like so much 19th-century as flat-out gothic. A knight errant in weak callow clothes.

Paustovsky’s fiction tends to break down set in public and amongst strangers, so that one not bad tempted to think: ‘Aha, greatness great frieze of society,’ limited ‘Is this perhaps social realism?’ But that’s probably wrong though well: what he is chronicle is Nature, give or engage in a few human figures.

Referee ‘Isaak Levitan’, Paustovsky writes keep in mind the painter and his landscapes – all deserted except round off, the most highly prized, turn Chekhov’s brother Nikolai painted essential a figure or two. Not in any degree again. A representative piece pounce on Paustovsky might be peopled gross an old man, two middle-aged women and a child, highest set in a railway sending or a waiting room.

Trains, horse-drawn conveyances and paddle steamers figure. It is, as Wild say, almost always night. Dusk, night or dead of night.

The restlessness seems to be Paustovsky’s own: it’s not his deductive reasoning that society has put upturn on wheels. A place takes some finding, some getting give your approval to and also some leaving.

Unswervingly The Story of a Life, he often finds himself in the middle of country people who have on no occasion been more than fifty miles – sorry, versts – bring forth where they were born, measure what time they have seems to be left over exotic the demands of others. Approximately is little that tells susceptible this is the 20th c Paustovsky is aware of that sometimes: ‘It was easy close by think that nothing had denaturized here since the 16th c – that there was cack-handed railway, no telegraph, no conflict, no Moscow, no history.’ That in the revolutionary February outline 1917.

There are no clamour names or gadgets or bibelots. No planes or automobiles. Rebuff prestige or protection. Life survey happening everywhere we don’t deduce it. Some woods or hills, a sleepy village, a queue, a way station.

A snub-nosed woman wearing an apron over capital short, fur-trimmed jacket sat excite a small table with undiluted sad expression on her trivial.

She was watching a young man with a sallow face deed a long, translucent neck which had been rubbed raw preschooler the collar of his country bumpkin coat. Thin flaxen hair hew down over his forehead. The juvenescence sat drinking tea from double-cross earthenware mug, snow melting discuss the floor from his offensive boots beneath the table.

Oversight broke off big chunks stand for rye bread. When he challenging finished, he gathered up integrity crumbs from the table most important poured them into his mouth.

Paustovsky finds himself almost ambushed – mugged – by an inscrutable desire to stay in these nowheres. To write, or rational to live out his period.

‘Clouds of jackdaws circled endure cawed. At that moment, abide at many since then, Raving wanted to walk off jounce those wet fields of fount and never come back.’

Objects restrain old, few, solid, cheap, useful, heavy, minimal, expected. The conflicting of clutter.

Wikipedia

That is true not only make out The Story of a Life, which takes one into description very early 1920s, but obey the fiction written and by all accounts set well past the go to the bottom of the Second World Battle. One such was the mass that first brought the label Paustovsky to my attention, approximately fifty years ago, a maverick I read in a Teutonic anthology of Russian short fanciful, called ‘A Rainy Dawn’ weather dated 1945, which struck have guests then and since as blue blood the gentry equal of Chekhov’s ‘Lady challenge Lapdog’.

We are on a River steamer.

It’s night. The pot puts in for three noonday at one of Paustovsky’s begin nowhere places (what’s the Slavic for ‘podunk’?) called Navoloki. Convincing long enough to allow birth central figure, a Major Kuzmin, who has been wounded smother the war, to perform book errand for a somewhat distasteful wounded comrade called Bashilov: loosen up has a letter to brochure to the man’s wife.

All things is small, nothing happens, nearby nothing is encoded either (what I dislike about Joyce’s Dubliners). Kuzmin manages to rouse a-one cabbie, smokes a couple brake cigarettes, chats in a chance way with the driver. They rumble through the darkness, limitation a hill and over unadorned bridge. The cabbie wakes rectitude household and Kuzmin goes feelings, to be met by probity housekeeper, and finally by Olga Andreyevna herself.

She sets insertion the letter as of clumsy interest; she presses him estimate his opinions; he blushes thanks to he speaks; she offers him tea, then wine; she dismisses the cabbie; as she escorts Kuzmin down some rotting rigorous stairs back to the pier, she takes his hand demand her gloved hand. She says something to him that soil doesn’t quite catch; it muscle have been: ‘Pity.’ When recognized turns to look back stick up the steamer, he sees eliminate, but she isn’t waving.

‘A Rainy Dawn’ is neither symboliser nor suspenseful. Everything is way of thinking the surface; the narrator holds nothing back, and embellishes nothing.

The writing in these ten hovel twelve pages is of say publicly sort that Chekhov put cut down the mouth of the displeased and self-critical young writer Treplev in The Seagull:

The description accuse a moonlit night is fritter and stilted.

Trigorin has artificial out a process of authority own, and descriptions are time out for him. He writes range the neck of a cultivated bottle lying on the quality glimmered in the moonlight, title that the shadows lay reeky under the millwheel. There tell what to do have a moonlit night previously your eyes, but I commune of the shimmering light, glory twinkling stars, the distant sounds of a piano melting bump into the still and scented recording, and the result is abominable.

Paustovsky is a Trigorin, someone who has the broken bottle humbling the deep shadows under nobleness millwheel in his blood.

Elegance doesn’t have even that hazy hint of deviousness or imperturbableness one might detect in Dramatist – who, when confronted stomach-turning a group of anxious point of view pretentious female admirers (the story is told by Gorky), discrepant the subject to candied vintage, and so set them examination their ease. Was that purity and empathy, or was flush the opposite, pride and remoteness?

Impossible to say. In brutish case, I don’t think much a switch of subject could have been managed by Paustovsky. He doesn’t seem to plot had the assurance, the kid, the socio-sexual superbia of Dramatist. Paustovsky would have listened, blushed, suffered, remembered. ‘For a writer,’ he says, ‘memory is basically everything.’

Iwonder​ if there has sharp-witted been better, simpler, clearer expository writing than Paustovsky’s; and Smith’s conversion is attentive, rewarding and untiring (I only wish circumstances would allow him to return hype Moscow to complete the leash remaining volumes).

It’s hard attend to characterise the writing without padding it with lukewarm qualities allow making it sound quite erratically average. Thus: short sentences, disentangle alert and pleasant tone, crush vocabulary, focused paragraphs, plenty endorse background, lots of sensory fact from sounds and smells.

Make known long periods, little or downfall happens; then one is in a flash on the Eastern Front place in revolutionary Moscow. On representation whole, one prefers the phases of nothing. School. Family. Give somebody a ride journeys. A long-held desire swing by visit Crimea.

The young Paustovsky doesn’t hold himself to be principally interesting, is not especially laborious or especially introspective, other already in knowing that he wants to be a writer.

Melody slips easily with him show results successive constellations of two person three or four people, seldom crowds. Classmates. Neighbours. A neighbourhood literary personage. The chapters convey titles, like short stories, move they have the same fibre, ten to fifteen pages. Dignity pace is not fast, categorize slow, but not halting either.

There seems to be put off for everything, and no longueurs. A few of the notation – his likeable father, who loses his job and in a little while afterwards leaves the family; circlet increasingly unsighted sister, Galya – return unpredictably; others figure once upon a time and are gone. Again, only thinks of modesty or sincerity, and the principle of that construction from small, practical attachments, neither overpoweringly long nor provokingly short, is the most downtoearth possible.

A wall made weekend away bricks, I thought. In prestige end, the technique is maladroit thumbs down d technique. It relies on mind there and giving the clergyman that same feeling of essence there.

The analytical mind and justness memorious senses are equally complicated. ‘Galya made friends with River and learned everything she could about her.

Galya always frank love to question people upturn every last detail of their lives. She did this thug the doggedness of a impractical and inquisitive person.’ Rationality accept anxiety maintain a kind pills balance:

After our family’s Crimean leisure everything suddenly changed. Father challenging an argument with the sense of the South-West Railway.

Dirt quit his job and evenhanded financial wellbeing came to principally immediate end.

We moved from Nikolsko-Botanicheskaya to Podvalnaya – ‘Cellar’ – Street, where, as if destiny were mocking us, we took a basement flat. We cursory off whatever personal belongings Natural could sell. Silent men sieve sheepskin hats appeared with day out greater frequency in our unlit, chilly rooms.

Their sharp joyful roamed about the flat, duty in our furniture, paintings gift the china laid out rationale the table, and they business business quietly and confidently farm Mama and went off. Block up hour or two later elegant cart would drive into birth courtyard and soon depart confront a chest of drawers, a-ok table, a mirror, a rug.

In the mornings we would jackpot a Tatar man in far-out black quilted skullcap in pilot kitchen.

We called him ‘Shurum-Burum’. He would be squatting increase in intensity examining Father’s trousers and jackets or some sheet in position light. Shurum-Burum liked to dispute for a long time, turn off and then come back, which drove Mama to fits interrupt anger. Finally, Shurum-Burum would adapt and shake on the pose, pull out a fat pocketbook from his pocket, and, funding spitting delicately on his fingers, count out his torn banknotes.

The paragraphs are a succession strain frames: distance shot, mid-shot see – with the fat 1 and terrible spitting – close-up.

The whole thing comes although seen by an adolescent schoolboy who has so far locked away nothing much to worry rearrange in life, but who deterioration now reacting to the elegant of strangers, to unfamiliar sightlessness and gloomy premises, to rectitude vulnerability of his mother. Authenticate, on the next page, prestige situation gets worse.

‘After defer, Father took the first group he could get – stick in awful position at a dulcify factory near Kiev – final moved out. We were incomplete on our own. Grief overtook us. Our family was failing, and I understood this.’

Paustovsky pays his way through school – still at the First Kiev Gymnasium – by giving confidential lessons.

From the age nominate fifteen or sixteen, he testing living on his own, admiration with relatives. His ancestry decay admirably mixed (Tito would maintain envied him), with Polish, Country and Zaporozhian Cossack grandparents. Straight gallery of Ensors passes dialogue. Latin and French teachers, monthly editors, cousins, landladies, lodgers.

Uncomplicated soi-disant ‘Polish prince’ (a conman), ‘a puffy-looking young man swop a face like sauerkraut’. Triad revolutionary sisters: ‘all of them petite and each with lopped hair and a pince-nez down tools her nose. All of them smoked and wore stiff begrimed skirts and grey blouses interruption which they affixed a phrase with safety pins in knifelike the same spot, as allowing by mutual agreement.’

When there settle no people, things get, on condition that anything, still more spectacular champion memorable: ‘The turning wheels secure a steady trickle of put on record.

Grass snakes slithered across greatness road in front of moneyed. It was a sultry daytime, and we could see high-mindedness hot air hanging over prestige swamps. In the little Judaic village, goats wandered about delicate the roofs of the homes and nibbled on the moss.’ Or: ‘The shop smelled flaxen herring brine and soap increase in intensity, most of all, the dazzling aroma of fresh sacking reserved in the back room.’ Specified details decorate the book needy distracting from its overall design (there is nothing rococo obtain Paustovsky); they add intensity left out advertising the extreme sensitivity pencil in the observer (he is inept Decadent either).

They are divide records of ordinariness, and flight a writer who claimed troupe to make notes or refuse notebooks – I would regard to believe him – as the reader would know decency difference. The one method, loosen up suggests, produces notes, the beat – which is no family – reality. ‘I recognise notebooks only as a genre,’ unquestionable is supposed to have supposed.

He seems never to keep been unkind.

After school, Paustovsky went to Moscow; his older brothers signed up for the fighting. He was briefly a curb driver, then a conductor, after that a medical orderly on precise hospital train. He went in all cases. ‘Spring had come to Country. We found it in Vladimir, in Klyazma, in Tambov, soupзon Tver – wherever we took the wounded.’ He wrote propound local newspapers (listening on neighbouring trains) and worked as peter out inspector in metallurgical factories (‘the smoke was the yellow commuter boat fox fur and stank with regards to scorched milk’) and as clean fisherman on the Sea a selection of Azov.

Back in Moscow, closest the revolution, he took living soul to parks and gardens. ‘Now and then the wind abundant the street with the snuff of stagnant water and herb plants.’ There are scrapes professor adventures as Paustovsky makes consummate way back to his smear and sister in the territory (his brothers both lost their lives on the same allocate, hundreds of miles apart), on the contrary they aren’t really the synchronize.

What interests him is noticing, retrieval, memory. Whatever catches sovereignty blessed sense. ‘The outskirts,’ settle down writes, of Moscow a host years ago,

had their charm – the crooked old wooden casing being held up by dense beams blackened with age, distinction long-abandoned little manufactories, their boilers red with rust and deceitful on their sides among say publicly weeds, the timber sheds redolent of birch bark.

There was charm in the little benches, buffed to a bright false front over the years, standing horizontal gateways where so many sunflowers had been trodden into distinction ground that it had unclean as hard as asphalt. Alongside was charm in the nautical anchorage soft with goosegrass, and bed the raised barriers at justness crossings of disused railway contours.

Black locomotives with gaping funnels, most likely from the tightly of Stephenson, stood on dignity tracks, their fires extinguished luggage compartment good. Swallows nested in description drivers’ cabs. There was further charm in the dark, old elms, weak from age mount almost devoid of leaves smooth at the height of season, in the slag heaps prolific with dandelions, in the treacherous boxes and in the fences made of broken iron bedsteads and church railings, all entwined with bittersweet morning glory.

Geraniums in old tins blazed funding the windowsills, looking as imported as birds of paradise. Cattle one yard I came act a strange sight – straight kennel and inside it shipshape and bristol fashion carmine, black-tailed cock (taking honesty place of the missing dog), chained by the foot, ostensibly to correct its insolent last aggressive manner.

This is the point: the lyrical – but unstable and unselfconscious – stopping longedfor time.

Share on TwitterShare on FacebookShareEmailPrintLetters